<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SD Computer CenterSD Computer Center | computer repair center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sdzoompc.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sdzoompc.com</link>
	<description>computer repair center</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Win 7 Antivirus 2012 &#8211; [ is a Trojan ]</title>
		<link>http://sdzoompc.com/?p=1137</link>
		<comments>http://sdzoompc.com/?p=1137#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdcomputercenter.com/?p=1137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Win 7 Antispyware 2012, Vista Antivirus 2012, and XP Security 2012
are all names for the same rogue anti-spyware program. This family of rogues is promoted ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #ff0000;">Win 7 Antispyware 2012, Vista Antivirus 2012, and XP Security 2012</span></h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;">are all names for the same rogue anti-spyware program. This family of rogues is promoted in two ways. The first is through the use of fake online antivirus scanner that indicates your computer is infected and then prompt you to download a file that will install the infection while telling you it is protection software. The other method are hacked web sites that attempt to exploit vulnerabilities in programs that you are running on your computer to install the infection without your knowledge or permission. Regardless, once running on your computer it will install itself as a variety of different program names and graphical user interfaces depending on the version of Windows that is running. Although it could have a different name, they are all ultimately the same program with just a different skin on it.</p>
<p>This is how it may appear:<br />
<a href="http://sdcomputercenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/w7a20121.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1139" title="w7a2012" src="http://sdcomputercenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/w7a20121.jpg" alt="" width="585" height="414" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Once started, the virus itself will scan your computer and state that there are numerous infections on it. If you attempt to use the program to remove any of these infections, it will state that you need to purchase the program first. Although in reality, the infections that the virus states are on your computer are all legitimate files that if deleted could cause Windows to not operate correctly. Therefore, please do not manually delete any files based upon the results from this rogue&#8217;s scan.</p>
<p>While running, XP Internet Security 2012, Win 7 Antivirus 2012, and Vista Security 2012 will also display fake security alerts on the infected computer. The text of some of these alerts are:</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;">Malware Intrusion</span><br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;"> Sensitive areas of your system were found to be under attack. Spy software attack or virus infection possible. Prevent further damage or your private data will get stolen. Run an anti-spyware scan now. Click here to start.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;">System danger!</span><br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;"> Your system security is in danger. Privacy threats detected. Spyware, keyloggers or Trojans may be working the background right now. Perform an in-depth scan and removal now, click here.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;">System Hijack!</span><br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;"> System security threat was detected. Viruses and/or spyware may be damaging your system now. Prevent infection and data loss or stealing by running a free security scan.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;">Privacy threat!</span><br />
<span style="color: #0000ff;"> Spyware intrusion detected. Your system is infected. System integrity is at risk. Private data can be stolen by third parties, including credit card details and passwords. Click here to perform a security repair.</span></p>
<p>As with all aspects of this infection, these are all fake security alerts.  The virus may also affect your internet browser in order to prevent you from seeking help or removing the virus, all aspects of this infection are designed to convince you to purchase the program.</p>
<p>Undoubtedly, this rogue is designed to steal your money.  Please do not purchase this program, and if you have, please contact your credit card company to dispute the charges stating that the program is a computer infection.</p>
<h4>We can safely and completely remove Win 7 Antispyware 2012, Vista Antivirus 2012, and XP Security 2012 from your computer.  Do not compromise your financial information falling into the trap of this virus, give us a call, we can help. <a title="Contact us" href="http://sdcomputercenter.com/?page_id=198">Contact us</a></h4>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sdzoompc.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1137</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Elements on the Mac App Store: 5 implications</title>
		<link>http://sdzoompc.com/?p=1101</link>
		<comments>http://sdzoompc.com/?p=1101#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdcomputercenter.com/?p=1101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Adobe has begun selling its Premiere Elements and Photoshop Elements software through the Mac App Store.
(Credit: screenshot by Stephen Shankland/CNET)
Adobe Systems and Apple may not ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2011/11/07/Premiere-Elements-Mac-App-Store.jpg" alt="Adobe has begun selling its Premiere Elements and Photoshop Elements software through the Mac App Store." width="618" height="468" /></p>
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Adobe has begun selling its Premiere Elements and Photoshop Elements software through the Mac App Store.<br />
(Credit: screenshot by Stephen Shankland/CNET)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Adobe Systems and Apple may not see eye to eye over the Flash Player plug-in, but they&#8217;ve come to an understanding with the new app store era of software distribution.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Adobe announced today that both its consumer-oriented photo and video software, Photoshop Elements 10 and Premiere Elements 10, are now available on the Mac App Store. The move parallels what Adobe already has done with iOS apps and expands on its earlier sales only of Photoshop Elements 9 on the Mac App Store.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Mac App Store, a standard feature of recent versions of Mac OS X, lets Apple account holders download software to their computers the same way they might download apps for their iPhones. I see five implications of Adobe using the Mac App Store compared to traditional ways of selling software.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Bye-bye boxed software<br />
First, and most obviously, it accelerates the move to software distribution by download. Adobe has been doing this for years through its own site, and plenty of other software arrives over the Net, but some folks are still accustomed to getting CDs or DVDs in a cardboard box. That&#8217;s especially true it comes to mammoth downloads like Photoshop Elements, at 1.21GB, or Premiere Elements, at 924MB.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Note also that although the Mac App Store pricing for the Elements packages&#8211;$79.99 each&#8211;roughly matches the cost of Premiere and Photoshop Elements 10 at retail outlets, it&#8217;s cheaper than what Adobe itself charges to buy directly from its site, $99.99 each. And although Adobe doesn&#8217;t have to pay for the server maintenance, billing, and download bandwidth consumption when a sale goes through the Mac App Store, Apple gets to keep 30 percent of the purchase price.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Apple as gatekeeper<br />
Second, those prices indicate growing comfort on Adobe&#8217;s part to rely at least in part on Apple for that distribution. Adobe has sold several iOS apps on the App Store used for iPhones and iPads, and it offers the free Carousel app for editing and sharing photos on the Mac App Store, but the Elements products are closer to the company&#8217;s core business.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Here&#8217;s why I find the company&#8217;s partnership with Apple notable: Adobe made a big stink in 2010 about how much control software makers cede when using Apple&#8217;s app stores to distribute software. When Apple&#8217;s App Store rules changes last year undermined Adobe&#8217;s technology for repackaging Flash apps, Adobe scrapped the development technique, and when Apple reversed course months later, Adobe resurrected the team and the technology. That&#8217;s not the kind of steady course a company wants to show developers.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">And using the Mac App Store means Adobe will have to abide by Apple strictures such as the requirement for app &#8220;sandboxing&#8221; for better security starting in March. Those sorts of requirements can be tough for developers accustomed to having more freedom&#8211;especially for developers creating software that also runs on Windows machines.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Mac App Store adjustments<br />
Third, the Mac App Store hasn&#8217;t yet caught up with some basic aspects of software sales. For one thing, you can&#8217;t buy the Elements bundle of both apps together on the Mac App Store. Online pricing at Amazon puts that package deal at about $135, which is substantially cheaper than the $159.99 you&#8217;d pay for both at the Mac App Store.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For another, there are questions about how upgrades work. Today&#8217;s app stores are geared for two alternatives: free minor updates or new versions that cost the same for both new and upgrading customers. Existing Photoshop and Premiere Elements customers don&#8217;t get a special deal here, and it&#8217;s not clear what will happen when version 11 rolls around, either. Will those who purchased through the Mac App Store get a significant discount? Will they be able to get update pricing if they buy the new version from Adobe and not through the Mac App Store?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I suspect Apple will fine-tune the Mac App Store to accommodate upgrade pricing. After all, it&#8217;s a common mechanism to keep software customers loyal, and while people may not object to paying a few bucks &#8220;again&#8221; for a significantly upgraded version of an iPad app, it&#8217;s a bigger deal for software that costs $80. Bundles, too, seem like something that could be accommodated with App Store refinements.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Buy once, run on multiple computers<br />
Fourth, there&#8217;s a possible tension in paying for multiple copies of the software. Apple&#8217;s Mac App Store gives permissions to run software based on the user account, so if you have three Macs in the house, all three of them may run the same software downloaded from the Mac App Store. But Adobe gives permissions by computer and doesn&#8217;t permit concurrent use of the same software. Here&#8217;s the relevant section from the end-user license agreement for version 9 of Elements (PDF), the most recent I could locate:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">16.17 Premiere Elements, Photoshop Elements or the Premiere Elements/Photoshop Elements Bundle (collectively, &#8220;Elements Software&#8221;) is licensed for non-concurrent use on either a compatible Mac OS or Windows operating system platform. By way of example, if you desire to install any Elements Software on both the Mac OS and Windows operating system platforms on a device that runs both of those platforms (i.e., a dual boot machine), then you may do so, provided that only one version of such Elements Software is operating at any given time.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Fluidly updated software<br />
Fifth is a byproduct of online software distribution: the shift toward fluidly updated software. The more we&#8217;re used to getting software online&#8211;as with smartphone apps and Web browsers, for example&#8211;the more ordinary it is to expect a constant series of bug fixes, security patches, and even new features added incrementally.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">How this will shake out for Adobe&#8217;s big software packages remains to be seen. I don&#8217;t expect Photoshop will become anytime soon a living project, no longer anchored down to specific major version releases, with new tools or user-interface tweaks arriving steadily. It&#8217;s hard to build that into corporate workflows, for one thing.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But in the long term, it seems at least possible&#8211;especially given Adobe&#8217;s move to subscription pricing for its flagship Creative Suite products&#8211;and online distribution enables that approach. And given how often Adobe&#8217;s own update software tries to get my attention, it&#8217;s clear the days are long gone that software is done when it&#8217;s burned into the installation disk.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Updated 9:12 a.m. PT to note that Photoshop Elements 9 previously was available on the Mac App Store.</p>
<div>
<p><img src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2011/11/07/premiere_color_610x381.jpg" alt="Premiere Elements&amp;#39; new Three-Way Color Corrector lets you adjust highlights, midtones, and shadows independently." width="610" height="381" />Premiere Elements&#8217; new Three-Way Color Corrector lets you adjust highlights, midtones, and shadows independently.</p>
<p>(Credit:<br />
Lori Grunin/CNET)</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sdzoompc.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1101</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LG&#8217;s thin and mighty P330 laptop surfaces at Korean retailer</title>
		<link>http://sdzoompc.com/?p=1099</link>
		<comments>http://sdzoompc.com/?p=1099#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 20:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdcomputercenter.com/?p=1099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember that LG 13.3-incher we covered back when it was warm? The one that had everything going for it except precise release info? Well, it&#8217;s ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/lg-p330.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="317" />Remember that LG 13.3-incher we covered back when it was warm? The one that had everything going for it except precise release info? Well, it&#8217;s finally dragged itself out of the factory and onto the shelves of a Korean retailer. Unfortunately, the Core i7 processor has been replaced by an i5-2435M running at 2.4GHz, but that&#8217;s hardly a deal breaker &#8212; and it&#8217;s possible a higher specced variant will eventually see daylight too. The other key credentials are all intact: an NVIDIA GeForce GT555M taking care of the visuals, a 40GB / 640GB SSD and HDD combo for snappier performance, and an IPS display built into an all-metal 1.7kg (3.6-pound) chassis. The price is listed as ?1,364,000, which converts to a hefty $1,220 &#8212; but we wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if LG takes that down to below the MBP threshold when the product comes stateside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sdzoompc.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1099</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP does the inevitable, announces the TouchSmart 620 with a 3D display and webcam (video)</title>
		<link>http://sdzoompc.com/?p=1094</link>
		<comments>http://sdzoompc.com/?p=1094#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdcomputercenter.com/?p=1094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HP&#8217;s pushed out a raft of all-in-ones this past year, but until today, there was one gimmicky stone it left unturned. Say hello to the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/touchsmart-620-3d.jpg" alt="" width="305" height="259" />HP&#8217;s pushed out a raft of all-in-ones this past year, but until today, there was one gimmicky stone it left unturned. Say hello to the TouchSmart 620, the company&#8217;s first 3D all-in-one. Essentially, it&#8217;s the 610 with ATI&#8217;s 3D tech shoehorned inside. Otherwise, it looks the same, with a 23-inch, 1080p panel and that sliding display that reclines at a nearly flat 60-degree angle. In addition to the 3D screen (best viewed when positioned upright), it has a webcam that captures 3D stills and video. At the base level, you&#8217;ll get a pair of active shutter glasses, TV tuner, a Core i5 CPU, 8GB of RAM, a 1.5TB HDD and an AMD Radeon HD 6650 card with 1GB of video memory. (For whatever reason, HP didn&#8217;t add HDMI-in this go &#8217;round.) That starting configuration technically costs $1,900, but HP&#8217;s going to apply $300 in instant savings when it goes on sale November 15, so for all intents and purposes it starts at $1,600. Full PR after the break, and if you need a refresher on what this thing looks like, we suggest you revisit our review of the 610.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/NnwL84R94Qw" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sdzoompc.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1094</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP embraces this 3D thing, outs 2311gt monitor and second-gen Wireless TV Connect</title>
		<link>http://sdzoompc.com/?p=1091</link>
		<comments>http://sdzoompc.com/?p=1091#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdcomputercenter.com/?p=1091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you haven&#8217;t noticed, HP&#8217;s really pushing this newfangled 3D thing right now. In addition to the TouchSmart 620, its first 3D desktop, the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/10/hp-2311gt-3d-monitor.jpg" alt="" width="314" height="207" />In case you haven&#8217;t noticed, HP&#8217;s really pushing this newfangled 3D thing right now. In addition to the TouchSmart 620, its first 3D desktop, the outfit just announced the 2311gt monitor, along with its second-generation Wireless TV Connect box, which now streams 3D content. Starting with the display, you&#8217;ve got a a 23-inch, 1080p panel that uses Film Patterned Retarder (FPR) technology to create 3D visuals by aligning every other row of pixels with the left or right eye. It&#8217;s a passive technology and indeed, we came away from our brief eyes-on with the impression that the 3D rendering isn&#8217;t as convincing as what you&#8217;ll get on the TouchSmart 620 and its active shutter glasses. Still, HP says when it comes to viewing there&#8217;s a sweet spot of 20 to 30 inches from the screen, and we have to admit we got the sharpest view from that vantage point. Also, HP threw in Cyberlink&#8217;s PowerDVD software for 2D-to-3D conversion, which makes this a potentially tempting deal. Moving on, the Wireless TV Connect box now streams 1080p movies in 3D, and HP claims to have lowered its latency, especially compared to Intel Wireless Display. Look for it in December with a $180 price tag. As for you, gamers, that 2311gt monitor will ring in at a reasonable $299 and go up for grabs mañana.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/hpwirelesstvconnectdesktop.jpeg" alt="" width="524" height="445" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sdzoompc.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1091</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft: Windows 8 Could Use Less Memory Than Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://sdzoompc.com/?p=990</link>
		<comments>http://sdzoompc.com/?p=990#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdcomputercenter.com/?p=990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft&#8217;s Windows 8 is aiming to minimize a PC&#8217;s memory usage through efficient design, allowing it to run on hardware originally designed for Windows 7.
In ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignleft" src="http://www6.pcmag.com/media/images/318552-windows-8-metro-browser.jpg?thumb=y" alt="" width="320" height="210" />Microsoft&#8217;s Windows 8 is aiming to minimize a PC&#8217;s memory usage through efficient design, allowing it to run on hardware originally designed for Windows 7.</p>
<p>In a blog post, Bill Karagounis, the group program manager of the Windows Performance team, said that the group&#8217;s goal with Windows 8 was always to ship with the same performance requirements as Windows 7. Interestingly, Karagounis wrote that the reason for doing this was to minimize the power consumption used by Windows 8 when running on a tablet.</p>
<p>&#8220;Something that might not be obvious is that minimizing memory usage on low-power platforms can prolong battery life. Huh? In any PC, RAM is constantly consuming power,&#8221; Karagounis wrote. &#8220;If an OS uses a lot of memory, it can force device manufacturers to include more physical RAM. The more RAM you have on board, the more power it uses, the less battery life you get.&#8221;</p>
<p>Karagounis also showed examples of Windows Task Manager running on a three-year-old Windows 7 machine. On the older machine, Windows used about 404 Mbytes, and 281 Mbytes running Windows 8.</p>
<p>&#8220;The specific hardware making up a machine, memory use of drivers, and even uptime can cause variability, so memory results will be different on different machines (or even the same machine at different times),&#8221; Karagounis wrote. &#8220;As you can see though, Windows 8 is doing well relative to Windows 7.&#8221;</p>
<p>How does Windows 8 minimize memory usage? Karagounis identified several methods: combining memory, or the ability of the OS to identify duplicate memory being used for identical tasks and then retain a single copy. Windows 8 will also move some services to a &#8220;start on demand&#8221; model, including Windows 8. In Windows 7, the services are automatically invoked. The OS also uses what Karagounis called a better priortization system, so that &#8220;low priority&#8221; memory needed by the system can be reallocated under pressure.</p>
<p>Microsoft has said that the &#8220;Metro&#8221; UI also eliminates the need to load all portions of the desktop, saving memory. And Windows 8 is simply more efficient in using memory, Karagounis added.</p>
<p><a title="Windows 8" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/br229516" target="_blank">Read More and Download</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sdzoompc.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=990</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

